Disturbing the peace under California Penal Code §415 is a “wobbler” between a misdemeanor and an infraction, covering fighting in public, making unreasonable noise, or using offensive words in a public place that are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction. The maximum exposure is 90 days in county jail and a $400 fine. PC §415 is often used as a reduction target in cases originally charged as battery, criminal threats, or vandalism. The Law Office of Zak Fisher represents people charged with PC §415 across Los Angeles County for a flat fee, with a free 20-minute consultation for anyone facing a pending charge.
Book a free 20-minute consultation
What Penal Code §415 actually says
California Penal Code §415 makes it unlawful for any person to:
- PC §415(1): Unlawfully fight in a public place or challenge another person in a public place to fight.
- PC §415(2): Maliciously and willfully disturb another person by loud and unreasonable noise.
- PC §415(3): Use offensive words in a public place that are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction.
The statute is punishable by up to 90 days in county jail, a fine of up to $400, or both. It can be filed as either a misdemeanor or an infraction at the prosecutor’s discretion. Infraction-level dispositions carry no jail and no probation.
What the prosecution must prove
For PC §415(1) (fighting in public)
- The defendant willfully and unlawfully fought another person or challenged another person to fight, and
- The fighting or challenge occurred in a public place.
Self-defense and defense of others are complete defenses. CALCRIM 2688 confirms the prosecution must prove the defendant did not act in lawful self-defense.
For PC §415(2) (unreasonable noise)
- The defendant made loud and unreasonable noise,
- The noise disturbed another person, and
- The defendant acted maliciously and willfully.
Under In re Brown, 9 Cal.3d 612 (1973), the noise subsection is constitutional only when limited to noise that either has no communicative content or that is uttered in a manner not intended as communication. Pure speech, even loud speech, cannot be punished under §415(2).
For PC §415(3) (offensive words)
- The defendant used offensive words in a public place, and
- The words were inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction.
This subsection is constitutionally limited to “fighting words” under Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942), and as further narrowed by Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971). Profanity, criticism of police, and political speech are not fighting words.
Common defenses to a PC §415 charge
- First Amendment: Both §415(2) and §415(3) have been repeatedly limited by appellate courts because of overbreadth concerns. Speech that is loud, vulgar, or critical, including criticism directed at police officers, is protected unless it falls within the narrow “fighting words” category. See City of Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987); People v. Callahan, 168 Cal.App.3d 631 (1985).
- Self-defense or defense of others: A complete defense to PC §415(1) fighting allegations.
- Not a public place: The conduct must occur in a public place. Private homes and certain private property are not “public” for §415 purposes.
- Mutual combat that ended: Once a fighter withdraws, continued aggression by the other party is not lawful self-defense for the aggressor.
- Lack of malice or willfulness: §415(2) requires malicious and willful conduct. Accidental or merely negligent noise is not enough.
- Not inherently likely to provoke violence: For §415(3), the words must be of the type that would provoke an average person to immediate physical retaliation. Most speech does not meet this standard.
- Pitchess motion: Under Evidence Code §§1043 to 1045, prior complaints against the arresting officer can be discovered. PC §415 cases often turn on the officer’s account of what happened.
- Motion to suppress: When evidence was obtained after an unlawful detention or arrest, a motion under PC §1538.5 is appropriate.
Penalty ranges for PC §415
Misdemeanor
- Up to 90 days in county jail
- Fine up to $400 plus penalty assessments
- Up to 1 to 3 years of summary probation
- Possible anger management or counseling
Infraction
- Fine only (typically up to $250)
- No jail, no probation, no criminal record beyond the infraction
Reducing a misdemeanor §415 filing to an infraction is a common pretrial outcome. Diversion under Penal Code §1001.95 is also frequently available, leading to outright dismissal on successful completion of conditions like a short anger management program or community service.
When PC §415 is used as a reduction
Disturbing the peace is one of the most common reduction targets in Los Angeles misdemeanor practice. Cases originally filed as the following often resolve to a §415 plea:
- Penal Code §242 simple battery
- Penal Code §243(e)(1) domestic battery
- Penal Code §422 criminal threats
- Penal Code §594 vandalism
- Penal Code §647(f) public intoxication
A §415 plea is attractive because it carries no immigration consequences as a crime involving moral turpitude in most cases, no impact on most professional licenses, and is not a “domestic violence” conviction even when it resolves a domestic battery charge.
What happens at a Los Angeles PC §415 arraignment
PC §415 cases are filed in the misdemeanor calendar of the courthouse covering the location of the alleged conduct. At arraignment, the court reads the complaint, addresses bail (most §415 defendants are released on own recognizance), and takes a plea. Under Penal Code §977, a represented defendant can authorize counsel to appear at most future court dates. After arraignment, the case moves to pretrial conferences for discovery review and negotiation. Most cases resolve before trial, either through dismissal, diversion under PC §1001.95, reduction to an infraction, or a negotiated plea.
How the Law Office of Zak Fisher handles PC §415 cases
Each case begins with a free 20-minute consultation. If the case is taken, the fee is flat and quoted in writing before engagement. Early steps include reviewing all bodycam and dashcam footage, identifying any First Amendment or self-defense issues, and assessing diversion eligibility under §1001.95. Where the facts support it, the practice files motions under PC §1538.5 and Evidence Code §1043 (Pitchess) and pushes for outright dismissal, diversion, or reduction to an infraction. The practice personally appears at every court date and answers texts and emails within one business day.
Contact
Law Office of Zak Fisher
8335 W. Sunset Blvd., Suite 354
West Hollywood, CA 90069
Phone: (310) 818-7461
Email: info@zakfisherlaw.com
Hours: Monday through Thursday 10:00 AM to 4:30 PM, Friday 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM
Book a free 20-minute consultation
Frequently asked questions about disturbing the peace in California
Is disturbing the peace a misdemeanor in California?
Penal Code §415 is a “wobblette,” meaning it can be filed as either a misdemeanor or an infraction at the prosecutor’s discretion. Maximum exposure as a misdemeanor is 90 days in county jail and a $400 fine. Infraction-level dispositions carry only a fine and no criminal record beyond the infraction.
What counts as a public place under PC §415?
A public place is any location open to common use by the public, including streets, sidewalks, parks, businesses open to the public, common areas of apartment buildings, and public transit. Private residences and most non-public areas of private property are not public places for §415 purposes.
Can I be charged with PC §415 for yelling at the police?
Probably not. The First Amendment protects speech directed at police officers, including profanity and criticism, unless the speech rises to the level of “fighting words” likely to provoke immediate violence. City of Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987), specifically protects verbal opposition to police action. Many §415(3) charges based on speech to officers fail on First Amendment grounds.
What is the difference between PC §415 and PC §647?
PC §415 covers fighting, unreasonable noise, and fighting words. PC §647 (disorderly conduct) covers a different set of offenses including public intoxication, soliciting prostitution, lewd conduct, and trespass to peep. The two often appear together in police reports but cover different conduct.
Will a PC §415 affect my immigration status?
In most circumstances, no. Disturbing the peace is generally not treated as a crime involving moral turpitude or an aggravated felony under immigration law. This is one reason §415 is a frequent reduction target in cases originally filed as battery, criminal threats, or vandalism. Always consult an immigration attorney about specific consequences.
Can disturbing the peace be expunged?
Yes. After successful completion of probation, a petition under Penal Code §1203.4 can withdraw the plea and dismiss the case. If the case was diverted under PC §1001.95, the dismissal upon successful completion is automatic and the defendant can lawfully state the arrest never occurred in most contexts.
Can a fight in a bar be charged as disturbing the peace?
Yes. A bar is a public place. A mutual fight in a bar is frequently charged under PC §415(1). Self-defense or defense of others is a complete defense if the defendant did not start the fight and did not use more force than was reasonably necessary.
What is the diversion option for PC §415?
Penal Code §1001.95 allows a judge to divert most misdemeanors, including §415, for up to 24 months on tailored conditions like community service or anger management. On successful completion, the case is dismissed.
Is disturbing the peace a fighting words crime?
Only PC §415(3) involves fighting words. §415(1) involves physical fighting, and §415(2) involves unreasonable noise. All three subsections have been narrowed by First Amendment case law to ensure they do not punish protected speech.
How long does a PC §415 stay on my record?
A conviction remains on the criminal record indefinitely unless expunged. Misdemeanor convictions can be expunged under PC §1203.4 after successful probation. Diverted cases under §1001.95 are dismissed and treated as never having occurred for most purposes. Infraction dispositions carry no criminal record beyond the infraction itself.